Search Results (612 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2025-54369 1 Node-saml 1 Node-saml 2025-12-15 N/A
Node-SAML is a SAML library not dependent on any frameworks that runs in Node. In versions 5.0.1 and below, Node-SAML loads the assertion from the (unsigned) original response document. This is different than the parts that are verified when checking signature. This allows an attacker to modify authentication details within a valid SAML assertion. For example, in one attack it is possible to remove any character from the SAML assertion username. This issue is fixed in version 5.1.0.
CVE-2025-64786 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft 6 Acrobat, Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader and 3 more 2025-12-12 3.3 Low
Acrobat Reader versions 24.001.30264, 20.005.30793, 25.001.20982, 24.001.30273, 20.005.30803 and earlier are affected by an Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to gain limited unauthorized write access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
CVE-2025-64787 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft 6 Acrobat, Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader and 3 more 2025-12-12 3.3 Low
Acrobat Reader versions 24.001.30264, 20.005.30793, 25.001.20982, 24.001.30273, 20.005.30803 and earlier are affected by an Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass cryptographic protections and gain limited unauthorized write access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
CVE-2025-13662 1 Ivanti 1 Endpoint Manager 2025-12-11 7.8 High
Improper verification of cryptographic signatures in the patch management component of Ivanti Endpoint Manager prior to version 2024 SU4 SR1 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code. User Interaction is required.
CVE-2025-66567 2 Onelogin, Saml-toolkits 2 Ruby-saml, Ruby-saml 2025-12-10 9.1 Critical
The ruby-saml library is for implementing the client side of a SAML authorization. ruby-saml versions up to and including 1.12.4 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability due to an incomplete fix for CVE-2025-25292. ReXML and Nokogiri parse XML differently, generating entirely different document structures from the same input. This allows an attacker to execute a Signature Wrapping attack. This issue is fixed in version 1.18.0.
CVE-2025-66568 2 Onelogin, Saml-toolkits 2 Ruby-saml, Ruby-saml 2025-12-10 9.1 Critical
The ruby-saml library implements the client side of an SAML authorization. Versions up to and including 1.12.4, are vulnerable to authentication bypass through the libxml2 canonicalization process used by Nokogiri for document transformation, which allows an attacker to execute a Signature Wrapping attack. When libxml2’s canonicalization is invoked on an invalid XML input, it may return an empty string rather than a canonicalized node. ruby-saml then proceeds to compute the DigestValue over this empty string, treating it as if canonicalization succeeded. This issue is fixed in version 1.18.0.
CVE-2024-38069 1 Microsoft 18 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 15 more 2025-12-09 7 High
Windows Enroll Engine Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability
CVE-2022-31807 1 Siemens 5 Sipass Integrated Ac5102 (acc-g2), Sipass Integrated Ac5102 \(acc-g2\), Sipass Integrated Ac5102 \(acc-g2\) Firmware and 2 more 2025-12-09 6.2 Medium
A vulnerability has been identified in Building X - Security Manager Edge Controller (ACC-AP) (All versions). Affected devices do not properly check the integrity of firmware updates. This could allow a local attacker to upload a maliciously modified firmware onto the device. In a second scenario, a remote attacker who is able to intercept the transfer of a valid firmware from the server to the device could modify the firmware "on the fly".
CVE-2025-65945 1 Auth0 1 Node-jws 2025-12-08 7.5 High
auth0/node-jws is a JSON Web Signature implementation for Node.js. In versions 3.2.2 and earlier and version 4.0.0, auth0/node-jws has an improper signature verification vulnerability when using the HS256 algorithm under specific conditions. Applications are affected when they use the jws.createVerify() function for HMAC algorithms and use user-provided data from the JSON Web Signature protected header or payload in HMAC secret lookup routines, which can allow attackers to bypass signature verification. This issue has been patched in versions 3.2.3 and 4.0.1.
CVE-2018-16152 3 Canonical, Debian, Strongswan 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Strongswan 2025-12-03 7.5 High
In verify_emsa_pkcs1_signature() in gmp_rsa_public_key.c in the gmp plugin in strongSwan 4.x and 5.x before 5.7.0, the RSA implementation based on GMP does not reject excess data in the digestAlgorithm.parameters field during PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification. Consequently, a remote attacker can forge signatures when small public exponents are being used, which could lead to impersonation when only an RSA signature is used for IKEv2 authentication. This is a variant of CVE-2006-4790 and CVE-2014-1568.
CVE-2018-16151 3 Canonical, Debian, Strongswan 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Strongswan 2025-12-03 7.5 High
In verify_emsa_pkcs1_signature() in gmp_rsa_public_key.c in the gmp plugin in strongSwan 4.x and 5.x before 5.7.0, the RSA implementation based on GMP does not reject excess data after the encoded algorithm OID during PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification. Similar to the flaw in the same version of strongSwan regarding digestAlgorithm.parameters, a remote attacker can forge signatures when small public exponents are being used, which could lead to impersonation when only an RSA signature is used for IKEv2 authentication.
CVE-2022-39366 1 Datahub 1 Datahub 2025-12-03 9.9 Critical
DataHub is an open-source metadata platform. Prior to version 0.8.45, the `StatelessTokenService` of the DataHub metadata service (GMS) does not verify the signature of JWT tokens. This allows an attacker to connect to DataHub instances as any user if Metadata Service authentication is enabled. This vulnerability occurs because the `StatelessTokenService` of the Metadata service uses the `parse` method of `io.jsonwebtoken.JwtParser`, which does not perform a verification of the cryptographic token signature. This means that JWTs are accepted regardless of the used algorithm. This issue may lead to an authentication bypass. Version 0.8.45 contains a patch for the issue. There are no known workarounds.
CVE-2024-23680 1 Amazon 1 Aws Encryption Sdk 2025-11-29 5.3 Medium
AWS Encryption SDK for Java versions 2.0.0 to 2.2.0 and less than 1.9.0 incorrectly validates some invalid ECDSA signatures.
CVE-2025-58356 1 Edgelesssys 1 Constellation 2025-11-28 N/A
Constellation is the first Confidential Kubernetes. The Constellation CVM image uses LUKS2-encrypted volumes for persistent storage. When opening an encrypted storage device, the CVM uses the libcryptsetup function crypt_activate_by_passhrase. If the VM is successful in opening the partition with the disk encryption key, it treats the volume as confidential. However, due to the unsafe handling of null keyslot algorithms in the cryptsetup 2.8.1, it is possible that the opened volume is not encrypted at all. Cryptsetup prior to version 2.8.1 does not report an error when processing LUKS2-formatted disks that use the cipher_null-ecb algorithm in the keyslot encryption field. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.24.0.
CVE-2024-48949 2 Indutny, Redhat 7 Elliptic, Acm, Multicluster Engine and 4 more 2025-11-25 9.1 Critical
The verify function in lib/elliptic/eddsa/index.js in the Elliptic package before 6.5.6 for Node.js omits "sig.S().gte(sig.eddsa.curve.n) || sig.S().isNeg()" validation.
CVE-2024-48948 2 Indutny, Nodejs 2 Elliptic, Elliptic 2025-11-25 4.8 Medium
The Elliptic package 6.5.7 for Node.js, in its for ECDSA implementation, does not correctly verify valid signatures if the hash contains at least four leading 0 bytes and when the order of the elliptic curve's base point is smaller than the hash, because of an _truncateToN anomaly. This leads to valid signatures being rejected. Legitimate transactions or communications may be incorrectly flagged as invalid.
CVE-2024-49394 3 Mutt, Neomutt, Redhat 3 Mutt, Neomutt, Enterprise Linux 2025-11-21 5.3 Medium
In mutt and neomutt the In-Reply-To email header field is not protected by cryptographic signing which allows an attacker to reuse an unencrypted but signed email message to impersonate the original sender.
CVE-2025-64456 1 Jetbrains 1 Resharper 2025-11-20 8.4 High
In JetBrains ReSharper before 2025.2.4 missing signature verification in DPA Collector allows local privilege escalation
CVE-2024-49393 3 Mutt, Neomutt, Redhat 3 Mutt, Neomutt, Enterprise Linux 2025-11-20 6.5 Medium
In neomutt and mutt, the To and Cc email headers are not validated by cryptographic signing which allows an attacker that intercepts a message to change their value and include himself as a one of the recipients to compromise message confidentiality.
CVE-2024-2307 1 Redhat 1 Enterprise Linux 2025-11-20 6.1 Medium
A flaw was found in osbuild-composer. A condition can be triggered that disables GPG verification for package repositories, which can expose the build phase to a Man-in-the-Middle attack, allowing untrusted code to be installed into an image being built.