| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| The Memory Usage, Memory Limit, PHP and Server Memory Health Check and Fix Plugin WordPress plugin before 2.46 does not have proper authorisation and CSRF in an AJAX action, allowing any authenticated users, such as subscriber to call it and install and activate arbitrary plugins from wordpress.org |
| A vulnerability identified in the Tailscale Windows client allows a malicious website to reconfigure the Tailscale daemon `tailscaled`, which can then be used to remotely execute code. In the Tailscale Windows client, the local API was bound to a local TCP socket, and communicated with the Windows client GUI in cleartext with no Host header verification. This allowed an attacker-controlled website visited by the node to rebind DNS to an attacker-controlled DNS server, and then make local API requests in the client, including changing the coordination server to an attacker-controlled coordination server. An attacker-controlled coordination server can send malicious URL responses to the client, including pushing executables or installing an SMB share. These allow the attacker to remotely execute code on the node. All Windows clients prior to version v.1.32.3 are affected. If you are running Tailscale on Windows, upgrade to v1.32.3 or later to remediate the issue. |
| A vulnerability identified in the Tailscale client allows a malicious website to access the peer API, which can then be used to access Tailscale environment variables. In the Tailscale client, the peer API was vulnerable to DNS rebinding. This allowed an attacker-controlled website visited by the node to rebind DNS for the peer API to an attacker-controlled DNS server, and then making peer API requests in the client, including accessing the node’s Tailscale environment variables. An attacker with access to the peer API on a node could use that access to read the node’s environment variables, including any credentials or secrets stored in environment variables. This may include Tailscale authentication keys, which could then be used to add new nodes to the user’s tailnet. The peer API access could also be used to learn of other nodes in the tailnet or send files via Taildrop. All Tailscale clients prior to version v1.32.3 are affected. Upgrade to v1.32.3 or later to remediate the issue. |
| daloRADIUS is an open source RADIUS web management application. daloRadius 1.3 and prior are vulnerable to a combination cross site scripting (XSS) and cross site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability which leads to account takeover in the mng-del.php file because of an unescaped variable reflected in the DOM on line 116. This issue has been addressed in commit `ec3b4a419e`. Users are advised to manually apply the commit in order to mitigate this issue. Users may also mitigate this issue with in two parts 1) The CSRF vulnerability can be mitigated by making the daloRadius session cookie to samesite=Lax or by the implimentation of a CSRF token in all forms. 2) The XSS vulnerability may be mitigated by escaping it or by introducing a Content-Security policy.
|
| REDCap through 14.9.6 has a security flaw in the Notes section of calendar events, exposing users to a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attack. An attacker can exploit this by luring users into accessing a calendar event's notes, which triggers a logout request and terminates their session. This vulnerability stems from the absence of CSRF protections on the logout functionality, allowing malicious actions to be executed without user consent. |
| REDCap through 14.9.6 has a security flaw in the Project Dashboards name, exposing users to a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attack. An attacker can exploit this by luring users into clicking on a Project Dashboards name that contains the malicious payload, which triggers a logout request and terminates their session. This vulnerability stems from the absence of CSRF protections on the logout functionality, allowing malicious actions to be executed without user consent. |
| AeroCMS v0.0.1 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF). |
| The DPD Baltic Shipping WordPress plugin before 1.2.57 does not have authorisation and CSRF in an AJAX action, which could allow any authenticated users, such as subscriber to delete arbitrary options from the blog, which could make the blog unavailable. |
| Cross-site Scripting (XSS) is a client-side code injection attack. The attacker aims to execute malicious scripts in a web browser of the victim by including malicious code in a legitimate web page or web application. |
| An issue in the save_users() function of Online Discussion Forum Site 1 allows unauthenticated attackers to arbitrarily create or update user accounts. |
| mysiteforme, as of 19-12-2022, has a CSRF vulnerability in the background blog management. The attacker constructs a CSRF load. Once the administrator clicks a malicious link, a blog tag will be added |
| Due to a missing authentication check, SAP Business Objects Business Intelligence Platform (Web Intelligence) - versions 420, 430, allows an authenticated non-administrator attacker to modify the data source information for a document that is otherwise restricted. On successful exploitation, the attacker can modify information causing a limited impact on the integrity of the application. |
| Helmet Store Showroom 1.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF). An unauthenticated user can add an admin account due to missing CSRF protection. |
| Gym Management System v0.0.1 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF). |
| Pligg CMS v2.0.2 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/domain_management.php?whitelist_add |
| Pligg CMS v2.0.2 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/domain_management.php?id=0&list=whitelist&remove=pligg.com |
| The login endpoint /FormLogin in affected web services does not apply proper origin checking.
This could allow authenticated remote attackers to track the activities of other users via a login cross-site request forgery attack. |
| IBM Security Access Manager for Web is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. |
| An issue was discovered on Schneider Electric IONXXXX series power meters ION73XX series, ION75XX series, ION76XX series, ION8650 series, ION8800 series, and PM5XXX series. There is no CSRF Token generated to authenticate the user during a session. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability can allow unauthorized configuration changes to be made and saved. |
| Several REST service endpoints of Apache Archiva are not protected against Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks. A malicious site opened in the same browser as the archiva site, may send an HTML response that performs arbitrary actions on archiva services, with the same rights as the active archiva session (e.g. administrator rights). |
