| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| The Float menu WordPress plugin before 6.0.1 does not have CSRF check in its bulk actions, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin delete arbitrary menu via a CSRF attack. |
| The WP Customer Area WordPress plugin through 8.2.4 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks |
| The WP Customer Area WordPress plugin through 8.2.4 does not have CSRF check in place when deleting its logs, which could allow attackers to make a logged in to delete them via a CSRF attack |
| The Counter Box WordPress plugin before 1.2.4 does not have CSRF checks in some bulk actions, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins perform unwanted actions, such deleting counters via CSRF attacks |
| The Herd Effects WordPress plugin before 5.2.7 does not have CSRF checks in some bulk actions, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins perform unwanted actions, such as deleting effects via CSRF attacks |
| The Popup Box WordPress plugin before 2.2.7 does not have CSRF checks in some bulk actions, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins perform unwanted actions, such as deleting popups via CSRF attacks |
| The Side Menu Lite WordPress plugin before 4.2.1 does not have CSRF checks in some bulk actions, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins perform unwanted actions, such as deleting buttons via CSRF attacks |
| The Sticky Buttons WordPress plugin before 3.2.4 does not have CSRF checks in some bulk actions, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins perform unwanted actions, such as deleting buttons via CSRF attacks |
| Simple Exam Reviewer Management System v1.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the Exam List. |
| The AdminPad WordPress plugin before 2.2 does not have CSRF check when updating admin's note, allowing attackers to make a logged in admin update their notes via a CSRF attack |
| The Dyn Business Panel WordPress plugin through 1.0.0 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack. |
| PwnDoc is a penetration test report generator. There is no CSRF protection in pwndoc, allowing attackers to send requests on a logged-in user's behalf. This includes GET and POST requests due to the missing SameSite= attribute on cookies and the ability to refresh cookies. Commit 14acb704891245bf1703ce6296d62112e85aa995 patches the issue. |
| The WP Projects Portfolio with Client Testimonials WordPress plugin through 3.0 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack. |
| The ENL Newsletter WordPress plugin through 1.0.1 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins delete arbitrary Campaigns via a CSRF attack |
| The ENL Newsletter WordPress plugin through 1.0.1 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack |
| The WooCommerce Customers Manager WordPress plugin before 29.8 does not have authorisation and CSRF in an AJAX action, allowing any authenticated users, such as subscriber, to call it and retrieve the list of customer email addresses along with their id, first name and last name |
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Nexus Dashboard and Cisco Nexus Dashboard hosted services could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system.
This vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface on an affected system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user to click a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privilege level of the affected user. If the affected user has administrative privileges, these actions could include modifying the system configuration and creating new privileged accounts.
Note: There are internal security mechanisms in place that limit the scope of this exploit, reducing the Security Impact Rating of this vulnerability. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability affecting Delete Marker Category, Delete Map, and Copy Map functions in WP Google Map plugin (versions <= 4.2.3). |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in flippercode WordPress Plugin for Google Maps – WP MAPS (formerly WP Google Map Plugin) plugin <= 4.4.2 versions. |
| The wp-google-map-plugin plugin before 2.3.10 for WordPress has CSRF in the add/edit location feature. |
