| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Teradek Cube 7.3.6 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to change administrative passwords without proper request validation. Attackers can craft a malicious web page with a hidden form to submit password change requests to the device's system configuration interface. |
| Teradek Slice 7.3.15 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to change administrative passwords without proper request validation. Attackers can craft a malicious web page that automatically submits password change requests to the device when a logged-in user visits the page. |
| Microhard Systems IPn4G 1.1.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions without user consent. Attackers can craft malicious web pages to change admin passwords, add new users, and modify system settings by tricking authenticated users into loading a specially crafted page. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Repute InfoSystems ARMember, Repute InfoSystems ARMember Premium allows Cross-Site Request Forgery.This issue affects ARMember: from n/a through 4.0.5; ARMember Premium: from n/a before 6.7.1. |
| The Simple Crypto Shortcodes plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.0.2. This is due to missing nonce validation on the scs_backend function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The Alex User Counter plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 6.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the alex_user_counter_function() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The WP Youtube Video Gallery plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing nonce verification on the wpYTVideoGallerySettingSave() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The Star Review Manager plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.2. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's CSS settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The Set Bulk Post Categories plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the bulk category update functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify post categories in bulk via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The ZT Captcha plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.4. This is due to improper nonce validation on the save_ztcpt_captcha_settings action where the nonce check can be bypassed by sending an empty token value. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The AdminQuickbar plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.9.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'saveSettings' and 'renamePost' AJAX actions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings and update post titles via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The SurveyJS: Drag & Drop WordPress Form Builder to create, style and embed multiple forms of any complexity plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.12.20. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the `SurveyJS_CloneSurvey` AJAX action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to duplicate surveys via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WPWeb WooCommerce Social Login allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WooCommerce Social Login: from n/a before 2.8.3. |
| Ubee EVW327 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to enable remote access without user interaction. Attackers can craft a malicious webpage that automatically submits a form to change router remote access settings to port 8080 without the user's consent. |
| A security vulnerability has been detected in birkir prime up to 0.4.0.beta.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code. Such manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet. |
| A vulnerability was detected in technical-laohu mpay up to 1.2.4. This affects an unknown function. Performing a manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is now public and may be used. |
| A vulnerability was determined in SourceCodester/Patrick Mvuma Patients Waiting Area Queue Management System 1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code. Executing a manipulation can lead to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. |
| The Newsletter – Send awesome emails from WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 9.1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the hook_newsletter_action() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to unsubscribe newsletter subscribers via a forged request granted they can trick a logged-in user into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| node-tar,a Tar for Node.js, has a race condition vulnerability in versions up to and including 7.5.3. This is due to an incomplete handling of Unicode path collisions in the `path-reservations` system. On case-insensitive or normalization-insensitive filesystems (such as macOS APFS, In which it has been tested), the library fails to lock colliding paths (e.g., `ß` and `ss`), allowing them to be processed in parallel. This bypasses the library's internal concurrency safeguards and permits Symlink Poisoning attacks via race conditions. The library uses a `PathReservations` system to ensure that metadata checks and file operations for the same path are serialized. This prevents race conditions where one entry might clobber another concurrently. This is a Race Condition which enables Arbitrary File Overwrite. This vulnerability affects users and systems using node-tar on macOS (APFS/HFS+). Because of using `NFD` Unicode normalization (in which `ß` and `ss` are different), conflicting paths do not have their order properly preserved under filesystems that ignore Unicode normalization (e.g., APFS (in which `ß` causes an inode collision with `ss`)). This enables an attacker to circumvent internal parallelization locks (`PathReservations`) using conflicting filenames within a malicious tar archive. The patch in version 7.5.4 updates `path-reservations.js` to use a normalization form that matches the target filesystem's behavior (e.g., `NFKD`), followed by first `toLocaleLowerCase('en')` and then `toLocaleUpperCase('en')`. As a workaround, users who cannot upgrade promptly, and who are programmatically using `node-tar` to extract arbitrary tarball data should filter out all `SymbolicLink` entries (as npm does) to defend against arbitrary file writes via this file system entry name collision issue. |
| GetSimple CMS My SMTP Contact Plugin 1.1.1 contains a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. Attackers can craft a malicious webpage that, when visited by an authenticated administrator, can change SMTP configuration settings in the plugin. This may allow unauthorized changes but does not directly enable remote code execution. |
