| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| IBM Spectrum Control (formerly Tivoli Storage Productivity Center) 5.2.x before 5.2.11 allows remote authenticated users to conduct clickjacking attacks via a crafted web site. |
| IBM Security Privileged Identity Manager 2.0 before 2.0.2 FP8, when Virtual Appliance is used, does not set the secure flag for the session cookie in an https session, which makes it easier for remote attackers to capture this cookie by intercepting its transmission within an http session. |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Report Builder and Data Collection Component (DCC) in IBM Jazz Reporting Service (JRS) 5.x before 5.0.2 ifix016 and 6.x before 6.0.1 ifix005 allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted URL, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-2888 and CVE-2016-0313. |
| IBM Rational Quality Manager (RQM) and Rational Collaborative Lifecycle Management 3.0.1.6 before iFix8, 4.x before 4.0.7 iFix11, 5.x before 5.0.2 iFix17, and 6.x before 6.0.1 ifix3 allow remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary OS commands via a crafted "HTML request." |
| IBM UrbanCode Deploy 6.0.x before 6.0.1.13, 6.1.x before 6.1.3.3, and 6.2.x before 6.2.1.1 allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive cleartext secure-property information via (1) the server UI or (2) a database request. |
| IBM WebSphere Automation 1.7.0 could allow an attacker with privileged access to the network to conduct a CSV injection. An attacker could execute arbitrary commands on the system, caused by improper validation of csv file contents. IBM X-Force ID: 285623. |
| IBM WebSphere Automation 1.7.0 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 285648. |
| The default configuration of sendmail in IBM AIX 6.1 and 7.1, and VIOS 2.2.1.4-FP-25 SP-02, allows local users to gain privileges by entering a command in a .forward file in a home directory. |
| Buffer overflow in the DB2 Administration Server (DAS) component in IBM DB2 9.1 before FP10, 9.5 before FP7, and 9.7 before FP3 on Linux, UNIX, and Windows allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors. |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in the SQL/PSM (aka SQL Persistent Stored Module) Stored Procedure (SP) infrastructure in IBM DB2 9.1, 9.5, 9.7 before FP7, 9.8, and 10.1 might allow remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code by debugging a stored procedure. |
| IBM Rational ClearQuest 7.1.x through 7.1.2.7 and 8.x through 8.0.0.3 allows remote attackers to obtain potentially sensitive information via a request to a (1) snoop, (2) hello, (3) ivt/, (4) hitcount, (5) HitCount.jsp, (6) HelloHTMLError.jsp, (7) HelloHTML.jsp, (8) HelloVXMLError.jsp, (9) HelloVXML.jsp, (10) HelloWMLError.jsp, (11) HelloWML.jsp, or (12) cqweb/j_security_check sample script. |
| The OSPF implementation in IBM i 6.1 and 7.1, in z/OS on zSeries servers, and in Networking Operating System (aka NOS, formerly BLADE Operating System) does not properly validate Link State Advertisement (LSA) type 1 packets before performing operations on the LSA database, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (routing disruption) or obtain sensitive packet information via a crafted LSA packet, a related issue to CVE-2013-0149. |
| The com.ibm.CORBA.iiop.ClientDelegate class in IBM Java 1.4.2 before 1.4.2 SR13-FP18, 5.0 before 5.0 SR16-FP3, 6 before 6 SR14, 6.0.1 before 6.0.1 SR6, and 7 before 7 SR5 improperly exposes the invoke method of the java.lang.reflect.Method class, which allows remote attackers to call setSecurityManager and bypass a sandbox protection mechanism via vectors related to the AccessController doPrivileged block. |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in lcfd.exe in Tivoli Endpoint in IBM Tivoli Management Framework 3.7.1, 4.1, 4.1.1, and 4.3.1 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via a long opts field. |
| The FXCLI_OraBR_Exec_Command function in FastBackServer.exe in the Server in IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) FastBack 5.5.0.0 through 5.5.6.0 and 6.1.0.0 through 6.1.0.1 uses values of packet fields to determine the content and length of data copied to memory, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted packet. NOTE: this might overlap CVE-2010-3059. |
| Buffer overflow in the Lotus Quickr for Domino ActiveX control in qp2.cab in IBM Lotus Quickr 8.1 before FP 8.1.0.32-001a, 8.2 before FP 8.2.0.28-001a, and 8.5.1 before FP 8.5.1.39-002a for Domino allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted web site. |
| CRLF injection vulnerability in IBM WebSphere Portal 6.1.0.x before 6.1.0.3 CF26, 6.1.5.x before 6.1.5 CF26, 7.0.0.x before 7.0.0.2 CF21, and 8.0.0.x through 8.0.0.1 CF5, when home substitution (aka uri.home.substitution) is enabled, allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via unspecified vectors. |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the IMS server before Ifix 6 in IBM Security Access Manager for Enterprise Single Sign-On (ISAM ESSO) 8.2 allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via crafted input to an unspecified dynamic web form. |
| Integer overflow in librpc.dll in portmap.exe (aka the ISM Portmapper service) in ISM before 2.20.TC1.117 in IBM Informix Dynamic Server (IDS) 7.x before 7.31.xD11, 9.x before 9.40.xC10, 10.00 before 10.00.xC8, and 11.10 before 11.10.xC2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (heap memory corruption) via a crafted parameter size, aka idsdb00146931, idsdb00146930, idsdb00146929, and idsdb00138308. |
| Multiple integer overflows in vclmi.dll in the visual class library module in IBM Lotus Symphony before 3.0.1 might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via an embedded (1) JPEG or (2) PNG image object in a Symphony document that triggers a heap-based buffer overflow, as demonstrated by a .doc file. |
