| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| OpenAirInterface v2.2.0 accepts Security Mode Complete without any integrity protection. Configuration has supported integrity NIA1 and NIA2. But if an UE sends initial registration request with only security capability IA0, OpenAirInterface accepts and proceeds. This downgrade security context can lead to the possibility of replay attack. |
| Tenda AC6 15.03.05.16_multi is vulnerable to Buffer Overflow in the formSetCfm function via the funcname, funcpara1, and funcpara2 parameters. |
| D-Link DI-8003 v16.07.26A1, DI-8500 v16.07.26A1; DI-8003G v17.12.21A1, DI-8200G v17.12.20A1, DI-8200 v16.07.26A1, DI-8400 v16.07.26A1, DI-8004w v16.07.26A1, DI-8100 v16.07.26A1, and DI-8100G v17.12.20A1 were discovered to contain a buffer overflow via the rd_en, rd_auth, rd_acct, http_hadmin, http_hadminpwd, rd_key, and rd_ip parameters in the radius_asp function. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted request. |
| QD 20230821 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF) via a crafted request |
| Siklu EtherHaul 8010 siklu-uimage-nxp-enc-10_6_2-18707-ea552dc00b devices have a static root password. |
| OpenAirInterface Version 2.2.0 has a Buffer Overflow vulnerability in processing UplinkNASTransport containing Authentication Response containing a NAS PDU with oversize response (For example 100 byte). The response is decoded by AMF and passed to the AUSF component for verification. AUSF crashes on receiving this oversize response. This can prohibit users from further registration and verification and can cause Denial of Services (DoS). |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the Print Format functionality of ERPNext v16.0.1 and Frappe Framework v16.1.1, where user-supplied HTML is insufficiently sanitized before being rendered into PDF. When generating PDFs from user-controlled HTML content, the application allows the inclusion of HTML elements such as <iframe> that reference external resources. The PDF rendering engine automatically fetches these resources on the server side. An attacker can abuse this behavior to force the server to make arbitrary HTTP requests to internal services, including cloud metadata endpoints, potentially leading to sensitive information disclosure. |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in D-Link DI-8003 16.07.26A1 due to improper handling of multiple parameters in the /web_post.asp endpoint. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP GET request in parameters such as name, en, user_id, log, and time. |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in D-Link DI-8003 16.07.26A1 and DI-8003G 19.12.10A1 due to improper handling of the wan_ping parameter in the /wan_ping.asp endpoint. |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in D-Link DI-8003 16.07.26A1 due to improper handling of the http_lanport parameter in the /webgl.asp endpoint. |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in D-Link DI-8003 16.07.26A1 due to improper validation of user input in the qj.asp endpoint. |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in D-Link DI-8003 16.07.26A1 due to inadequate input validation in the /tggl.asp endpoint. |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in D-Link DI-8003 16.07.26A1 due to improper validation of the id parameter in the /thd_member.asp endpoint. |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in D-Link DI-8003 16.07.26A1 due to improper handling of the custom_error parameter in the /user.asp endpoint. |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in D-Link DI-8003 16.07.26A1 due to improper handling of the name parameter in the /url_group.asp endpoint. |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in D-Link DI-8003 16.07.26A1 due to improper handling of input parameters in the /web_keyword.asp endpoint. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP GET request via the name, en, time, mem_gb2312, and mem_utf8 parameters. |
| IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access Container 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 allows an attacker to contact internal authentication endpoints which are protected by the Reverse Proxy. |
| IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access Container 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 could allow a locally authenticated user to escalate their privileges to root due to execution with unnecessary privileges than required. |
| When verifying a certificate chain containing excluded DNS constraints, these constraints are not correctly applied to wildcard DNS SANs which use a different case than the constraint. This only affects validation of otherwise trusted certificate chains, issued by a root CA in the VerifyOptions.Roots CertPool, or in the system certificate pool. |
| SWIG file names containing 'cgo' and well-crafted payloads could lead to code smuggling and arbitrary code execution at build time due to trust layer bypass. |
