| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| OpenClaw before 2026.3.31 contains a replay detection bypass vulnerability in webhook signature handling that treats Base64 and Base64URL encoded signatures as distinct requests. Attackers can re-encode Telnyx webhook signatures to bypass replay detection while maintaining valid signature verification. |
| OpenClaw before 2026.4.2 contains an insufficient scope vulnerability in Zalo webhook replay dedupe keys that allows legitimate events from different conversations or senders to collide. Attackers can exploit weak deduplication scoping to cause silent message suppression and disrupt bot workflows across chat sessions. |
| OpenShell before 2026.3.28 contains an arbitrary code execution vulnerability in mirror mode that converts untrusted sandbox files into workspace hooks. Attackers with mirror mode access can execute arbitrary code on the host during gateway startup by exploiting enabled workspace hooks. |
| OpenClaw before 2026.4.2 contains an approval integrity vulnerability in pnpm dlx that fails to bind local script operands consistently with pnpm exec flows. Attackers can replace approved local scripts before execution without invalidating the approval plan, allowing execution of modified script contents. |
| DNN (formerly DotNetNuke) is an open-source web content management platform (CMS) in the Microsoft ecosystem. Starting in version 6.0.0 and prior to version 10.2.2, in the friends feature, a user could craft a request that would force the acceptance of a friend request on another user. Version 10.2.2 patches the issue. |
| A vulnerability in SenseLive X3050’s management ecosystem allows unauthenticated discovery of deployed units through the vendor’s management protocol, enabling identification of device presence, identifiers, and management interfaces without requiring credentials. Because discovery functions are exposed by the underlying service rather than gated by authentication, an attacker on the same network segment can rapidly enumerate targeted devices. |
| A vulnerability in SenseLive X3050’s web management interface allows authentication logic to be performed entirely on the client side, relying on hardcoded values within browser-executed scripts rather than server-side verification. An attacker with access to the login page could retrieve these exposed parameters and gain unauthorized access to administrative functionality. |
| A vulnerability in SenseLive X3050’s embedded management service allows full administrative control to be established without any form of authentication or authorization on the SenseLive config application. The service accepts management connections from any reachable host, enabling unrestricted modification of critical configuration parameters, operational modes, and device state through a vendor-supplied or compatible client. |
| A vulnerability in
SenseLive
X3050’s web management interface allows unauthorized access to certain configuration endpoints due to improper access control enforcement. An attacker with network access to the device may be able to bypass the intended authentication mechanism and directly interact with sensitive configuration functions. |
| A vulnerability exists in SenseLive
X3050’s web management interface due to improper session lifetime enforcement, allowing authenticated sessions to remain active for extended periods without requiring re-authentication. An attacker with access to a previously authenticated session could continue interacting with administrative functions long after legitimate user activity has ceased. |
| A vulnerability in SenseLive X3050’s remote management service allows firmware retrieval and update operations to be performed without authentication or authorization. The service accepts firmware-related requests from any reachable host and does not verify user privileges, integrity of uploaded images, or the authenticity of provided firmware. |
| A vulnerability exists in SenseLive X3050's web management interface that allows critical configuration parameters to be modified without sufficient authentication or server-side validation. By applying unsupported or disruptive values to recovery mechanisms and network settings, an attacker can induce a persistent lockout state. Because the device lacks a physical reset button, recovery requires specialized technical access via the console to perform a factory reset, resulting in a total denial-of-service for the gateway and its connected RS-485 downstream systems. |
| AdaptiveGRC is vulnerable to Stored XSS via text type fields across the forms. Authenticated attacker can replace the value of the text field in the HTTP POST request. Improper parameter validation by the server results in arbitrary JavaScript execution in the victim's browser.
Critically, this may allow the attacker to obtain the administrator authentication token and perform arbitrary actions with administrative privileges, which could lead to further compromise.
This issue occurs in versions released before December 2025. |
| DWM-222W USB Wi-Fi Adapter developed by D-Link has a Brute-Force Protection Bypass vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated adjacent network attackers to bypass login attempt limits to perform brute-force attacks to gain control over the device. |
| Delta Electronics AS320T has no checking of the length of the buffer with the directory name
vulnerability. |
| Tempo queries with large limits can cause large memory allocations which can impact the availability of the service, depending on its deployment strategy.
Mitigation can be done by setting max_result_limit in the search config, e.g. to 262144 (2^18). |
| Exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor in Azure IOT Central allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. |
| A client holding only a read JWT scope can still register itself as a signal provider through the production kuksa.val.v2 OpenProviderStream API by sending ProvideSignalRequest.
1. Obtain any valid token with only read scope.
2. Connect to the normal production gRPC API (kuksa.val.v2).
3. Open OpenProviderStream.
4. Send ProvideSignalRequest for a target signal ID.
5. Wait for the broker to forward GetProviderValueRequest.
6. Reply with attacker-controlled GetProviderValueResponse.
7. Other clients performing GetValue / GetValues for that signal receive forged data. |
| The Taqnix plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.3. This is due to a missing nonce verification in the taqnix_delete_my_account() function, where the check_ajax_referer() call is explicitly commented out on line 883. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trick a logged-in non-administrator user into deleting their own account via a forged request granted they can trick the user into performing an action such as clicking a link or visiting a malicious page. |
| The Booking Calendar Contact Form plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.63 via the dex_bccf_admin_int_calendar_list.inc.php file due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to takeover other user's calendars and view user data associated with the calendar. |
